TO ALL ASIAN-AMERICANS AND VETERANS:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/01/world/putin-nato-security-strategy/index.html

THE CANADIAN AND MEXICAN BORDER THREATS TO NATO NEED TO BE ADDRESSED WITH HIGHER RATES OF COSTA RICAN, REHABILITATION SHELTERS, AND MEDICAL SHIPS TURNED OVER TO DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS, FOR THE REHABILITATION OF DRUG-ADDICTED, UNDERAGE, CHILD RAPE SLAVES.

IF THE U.S. EXPECTS RUSSIAN COOPERATION, THEY MUST ARRIVE AT NATO DISCUSSIONS WITHOUT SO MANY INTERNAL RISKS, ESPECIALLY OF REPRESENTING THE INTERESTS OF CANADIAN, MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS, TO AN IMPOVERISHED NATION, THAT IS TRULY STRUGGLING WITH UKRAINIAN VIOLENCE, AND UNREST. MANY IN THE U.S. BELIEVE AMERICA IS SOMEHOW AT FAULT, FOR NOT INTERCEDING ON BEHALF OF UKRAINE, WHICH HAS INDEED SUFFERED IMMENSELY, SINCE THE RUSSIAN TAKEOVER.

WE CAN'T BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EURO ZONE CRISIS, FINANCIAL COLLAPSE OF THE GREEK ECONOMY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION, AND EXPECT TO FIGHT A WAR AGAINST ISIL SUCCESSFULLY.

THE REASONS FOR A RUSSIAN-DOMINATED UKRAINE WERE:

1.  A TIME OF HISTORICALLY LIMITED, U.S. NAVY FORCES

2.  A PREDOMINANTLY DISENGAGED, POLY-ADDICTED, LATCHKEY-ORPHANED, MILLENNIAL GENERATION, THAT SIMPLY DOES NOT WANT TO JOIN, OR SUPPORT THE U.S. MILITARY, OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, OVER GLOSSY, MTV-ESQUE, ISIL RECRUITMENT CAMPAIGNS

3.  AN AGING, BABY BOOMER DEMOGRAPHIC, RETIRING COMPLETELY FROM THE U.S. MILITARY

http://www.forbes.com/sites/dougschoen/2014/05/22/putin-is-sponsoring-sectarian-violence-in-ukraine/

TYPICALLY, RUSSIANS ARE BOTH A BLEND OF EUROPEAN AND ASIAN CULTURES. THE UNITED STATES HAS NO INTEREST IN MAINTAINING CIVIL/DIPLOMATIC RELATIONSHIPS WITH EITHER CONTINENTS, UNDER PRESIDENT OBAMA. QUITE THE OPPOSITE HAS OCCURRED BY HIS ADMINISTRATION. THIS WITHDRAWAL OF NATO SUPPORT BY RUSSIA IS UNSURPRISING, AND A FAILURE OF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA'S CABINET.