Hillary Clinton Should Have Been Assigned I.T. Security Experts (15,000 C.C.I.E.'s in Security)

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2015/03/hillary-clintons-e-mails

It's easier for us to condemn Hillary Clinton for not following protocol. However, I can see the advantages of using a faster (albeit less secure) method of communication. I admit, higher-level encryption can drastically slow down the speed of e-mailing everyone. Type A personalities, who typically become executives, will often be challenged by all the protocols, and slower internet speed.

If you try to distract these types from their missions, they become extremely unpleasant with you. I have experienced this problem, on a smaller scale, where executives of all political stripes, in many industries, have the same obsessive, controlling, mentality to be independent of every single person around them, no matter what the costs would be for the entire team/unit.

Knowing that every Secretary of State is probably a type A executive, a bigger concern for me, regarding this scandal, is why couldn't we have prevented this, by assigning 15,000 CCIE's in Security, in advance, to her, 24/7 as Secretary of State. As we elect these officials, I personally have not trusted any of them to provide all transcripts of their in-person meetings, nor all electronic communications to their own governmental "Inspector Generals," let alone to the public at all.

I assume everyone saw President Sarkozy during the 2007, German G-8 Conference. I can only hope that the Joint Chiefs of Staff will be the actual ones in positions of power, after watching any political summit. The political backstabbing of Congress has possibly escalated to the brutal assassinations of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, and three other American diplomats. People will assume we've participated in the extremely violent  assassinations our own American Ambassador, three of his American staff, in Libya and are still covering it up.